The decision made by the caretaker government to not consider individuals associated with web channels as journalists is questionable and raises several concerns regarding media freedom and the evolving landscape of journalism. Here are some critical points about this decision:
Freedom of Expression: This decision seems to infringe upon the fundamental right to freedom of expression. In the digital age, many web channels and independent content creators play a crucial role in disseminating news and information. Discrediting them as non-journalists could be seen as an attempt to restrict freedom of expression.
Changing Media Landscape: The distinction between traditional journalism and new media is becoming increasingly blurred. Many established media houses maintain a significant online presence through websites and social media channels. It's not appropriate to exclude web channels and creators from the realm of journalism.
Impact on Independent Journalism: Web channels often serve as platforms for independent and alternative journalism. They can cover stories and issues that might be overlooked by mainstream media. Discrediting them could stifle independent voices.
International Standards: This decision appears to contradict international standards of journalism. Journalists are recognized based on their function, not the medium through which they operate. International bodies like the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Reporters Without Borders (RSF) consider digital journalists as part of the journalistic community.
Arbitrary Decision: The decision to exclude web channels appears arbitrary and lacks a clear rationale. It's essential that any restrictions on journalistic activities are well-founded, transparent, and in line with established principles of democracy.
Impact on Media Diversity: By excluding web channels, the caretaker government may inadvertently limit media diversity. A diverse media landscape is essential for a vibrant democracy, and web channels often contribute to this diversity.
Transparency and Accountability: It's crucial that any limitations on journalistic activities should be defined clearly and communicated transparently. The decision should also be open to public debate and discussion.
In conclusion, the decision by the caretaker government to exclude web channels and content creators from the definition of journalists raises significant concerns about media freedom, freedom of expression, and the changing landscape of journalism. It is essential to revisit and reconsider this decision while keeping in mind the principles of democracy and freedom of the press.
نگراں حکومت کا بڑا فیصلہ ویب چینلز والوں کو صحافی تصور نہیں کیا جائے گا سندھ کے تمام ڈی سیز اور ایس ایس پیز کو لیٹر جاری
سیٹلائٹ چینلز اور مارکیٹ میں آنے والے اخبارات کے نمائندے ہی صحافی ہونگے ویب چینلز والوں کو صحافی تصور نہیں کیا جائے گا نگراں حکومت نے ڈی سیز اور ایس ایس پیز کو لیٹر جاری کردیئے
Posts
